Revisiting the Continued Relevance of Adultery Damages in Light of the International Women’s Day Commemorations by Lincoln Majogo.

-

The reservation of the 8th of March every year to commemorate Women’s International Day remains relevant in celebrating achievements by women and the continued pursuit of gender equity and equality. This day isn’t just about celebrating women for television purposes or for social media mileage. This day has everything to do with reflecting on current socio-economic issues still affecting women and creating solutions to solve these existing problems.

As l was pondering on this very important day, my mind couldn’t resist reflecting on adultery damages in light of the ongoing Women's Day celebrations. My natural inclination is that today creates a special occasion to reignite the discussion on the continued relevance of adultery damages in Zimbabwe in light of the vast evidence that the delict perpetuates damaging stereotypes against mostly women. 

Adultery occurs when a third party knowingly has sexual intercourse with a married spouse in a monogamous civil marriage. The innocent spouse assumes a right to sue the third party for adultery damages. In other words, the guilty spouse is shielded from this lawsuit by the innocent spouse. Women married under customary law have no right to sue for adultery damages because by its very nature customary law is potentially polygamous. Although this is the law, most cases if not all in Zimbabwe involving adultery damages have been instituted by married women against other women(third parties). It is within this context that I believe that the current legal framework regulating adultery damages is unfair, especially to women.

l cannot fathom why the “cheating husband” for example is exempted from being sued by their spouse whilst the third party attracts full civil liability for the extra-marital affair. This has resulted in the reasoning that the third party is guilty because ‘she induced the married man to cheat on his wife’. This thinking simply portrays women as natural adulterers and men as weak people who have no control over their sexual desires thus they are innocently tricked into cheating on their spouses. It is these stereotypes that are worth interrogating on this special day in order to assess how this day can also be used as a tool to lobby for laws that promote equal treatment before the law. By no means am l condoning adultery but if it's a punishment for breach of a marriage contract, both parties who indulge in this extra-marital affair should be punished or we abolish it!

Based on the foregoing, it is clear that while we celebrate International Women’s day, there is still a lot to be done to protect women from discriminatory laws that perpetuate damaging stereotypes against their personalities. I end by saying Happy International Womens Day!

 

About the author

Lincoln is a registered legal practitioner, notary public, and conveyancer currently practicing in Zimbabwe. He writes in his personal capacity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Navigating the complexities of the sole responsibility requirement in UK visa applications by Lincoln Majogo.

-
As economic pressures continue to exert their full might on Zimbabweans, many are emigrating to Europe, the United Kingdom(UK) being a common destination to scout for better employment opportunities. Due to these developments, there is an increase in court cases dealing with applications for custody and guardianship, which are mostly meant to allow those emigrating to travel with their minor children for an indefinite stay. Even with documents of sole custody, many visa applications have been rejected by the UK Home Office. One major reason for rejection is that the parent making the application (Applicant parent) has failed to prove that they have sole responsibility over the minor's upbringing. In this article, we briefly assess what sole responsibility entails in the context of immigration law in the United Kingdom.   Where a parent is already a resident in the UK and intends to bring their minor child along for an indefinite stay, they can do so under 3 broad circumstances.
Read more

PSG’s Hakimi Achraf’s ‘genius’ claims ignite discussion on property rights upon divorce in Zimbabwe.

-
By Lincoln Majogo. For avid football fans like myself, the name Hakim Ashraf is a very familiar name. He is one of the famous faces of Morocco, that took the country's national team to the semi-finals of the World Cup in 2022 after defeating Portugal in the quarter-finals of the competition. Recently, social media has been awash with his pictures whilst kissing his mother with captions titled “genius”. This follows false rumors in which his wife allegedly filed for divorce seeking to claim 50% of his property only to be informed by the court that the football star has no properties registered in his name. It was alleged that a significant chunk of his wealth goes to his mother. Although the wife has reportedly denied filing for divorce, this incident has raised an interesting legal dynamic that has resulted in various interpretations regarding how the courts would handle such a case. The assumption is that the footballer was simply using his mother as a scheme to prevent his wife
Read more

High Court Judgment pits Children's Rights Activists against Parents over Corporal Punishment.

-
The recent decision of the High Court of Zimbabwe which upheld the lawfulness of corporal punishment on minors by parents and guardians has brought to the fore the discussion on whether corporal punishment should be abolished. For some of us who were raised in a conservative Christian family, Proverbs 13:24 is a familiar verse in our hearts. It says ‘spare the rod and spoil the child’ and for people like us who constantly committed acts of misconduct whilst growing up, our parents made sure that the rod would pay regular visits on our buttocks, legs, hands, and thighs. Of course, there are instances where it went out of hand but l can gladly say the fear of the rod, kept me out of harm’s way. The recent High Court judgment in State v Yeukai Graham Mutero HH178-23 has confirmed that corporal punishment or rather beating up children as a way of disciplining them by parents or guardians is legal. In this case, the accused who was the mother of the deceased administered corporal punish
Read more